Legislature(1995 - 1996)

03/09/1996 10:03 AM House STA

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
 HB 401 - REVENUE BONDS: WATER & WASTE PROJECTS                              
                                                                               
 The next order of business to come before the House State Affairs             
 Committee was HB 401.                                                         
                                                                               
 CHAIR JAMES called on Keith Kelton, Department of Environmental               
 Conservation, to present the bill.                                            
                                                                               
 Number 1900                                                                   
                                                                               
 KEITH KELTON, Director, Division of Facility Construction and                 
 Operation, Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC),                    
 explained HB 401 was by the request of the Governor.  It was a bill           
 that would benefit all the communities in Alaska.  He asked the               
 committee members to look at the bill and not at who introduced the           
 piece of legislation.                                                         
                                                                               
 Number 1910                                                                   
                                                                               
 CHAIR JAMES replied the assumption that the bill would not be                 
 looked favorably upon because it was introduced by the Governor was           
 not true.                                                                     
                                                                               
 Number 1919                                                                   
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON replied, "I stand corrected, Madame Chairman.  I                   
 apologize."                                                                   
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON said the DEC had been operating a loan program for                 
 building wastewater facilities throughout the state for the last              
 seven to eight years.  Prior to that the federal government                   
 financed a grant program under the Clean Water Act.  In 1987 the              
 federal government eliminated the grant program and substituted it            
 with a loan program.  The demand for the loans had been steadily              
 increasing while the state general funds had decreased.  Therefore,           
 the grants were less available.  The DEC was interested in                    
 developing an alternative funding source for communities that had             
 the ability to borrow money and had a dedicated revenue stream to             
 repay the loans.  The problem currently was that the loan fund was            
 demanded in excess of the supply of money available.  Therefore,              
 the DEC introduced legislation to allow the Department to leverage            
 the remaining corpus of the loan fund and allow for increased                 
 dollars to be available for the loans.  To date, Alaska had a good            
 track record for repayments, not one late payment.                            
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON referred the committee members to a chart prepared by              
 DEC.  He explained the Alaska Clean Water Fund (ACWF) was                     
 capitalized by federal grants representing about $80 million.  Of             
 that $80 million, $50 million had gone out as low interest loans to           
 the various Alaskan municipal projects.  One year after completion,           
 payments were made back including the principal and interest to the           
 ACWF.  The interest rate fluctuated with the municipal bond index,            
 currently at 3.55 percent.                                                    
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN asked if the bond was tax free?                          
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON replied it was tax exempt.  Furthermore, HB 401 created            
 a bond redemption fund to pay for the bond issuance cost                      
 administered through the State Bond Committee including the                   
 Department of Revenue, Department of Administration, and Department           
 of Commerce and Economic Development.  The Senate amended the bill            
 to include a $15 million limit of bonds sold each year, and a total           
 cap of $150 million.  He reiterated the bill was to provide a                 
 revolving fund mechanism for the incorporated communities that had            
 a dedicated revenue source for repayments.  Anchorage was the big             
 participant, but communities such as Craig and Homer, for example,            
 had applied for a loan.  The program included wastewater and solid            
 waste, but not drinking water.  There was legislation at the                  
 federal level to address a drinking water program, however.                   
                                                                               
 Number 2378                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN wondered if the investor was investing in the            
 program and not in the individual location.                                   
                                                                               
 Number 2394                                                                   
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON replied the investor was putting his money into the pot.           
 The Department had to follow an intended use plan on an annual                
 basis.  The plan used a criteria rank system to determine which               
 projects would rank at the top, if it exceeded the amount of money            
 available.                                                                    
                                                                               
 Number 2440                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN asked if the criteria ranking system was based           
 on need, the ability to repay, or a combination of the two?                   
                                                                               
 Number 2447                                                                   
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON replied the first concern was based on need.                       
 Environment and health were also considered, for example.  The                
 ability to repay was looked at after everything else was                      
 considered.                                                                   
                                                                               
 Number 2475                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN wondered if energy was a concern in the rural            
 areas.                                                                        
                                                                               
 TAPE 96-33, SIDE B                                                            
 Number 0000                                                                   
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON said the rural areas were eligible to apply.  The                  
 additional cost would make it more difficult for it to come up with           
 a revenue matching source, however.  He did not expect it to be               
 widely used in the rural areas of the state.                                  
                                                                               
 Number 0022                                                                   
                                                                               
 CHAIR JAMES asked if it was a 50 percent match?                               
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON replied it was strictly a loan.                                    
                                                                               
 CHAIR JAMES asked if a community could get a loan for an entire               
 project?                                                                      
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON replied, "that's correct."                                         
                                                                               
 CHAIR JAMES further wondered if a community could get a grant and             
 apply it towards the loan.                                                    
                                                                               
 Number 0035                                                                   
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON replied, "that's exactly right, Madame Chairman."  The             
 Department could mix and match with the loan program in any ratio.            
                                                                               
 Number 0129                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE IVAN moved to adopt Amendment 1 (9-GH2014/A.1).                
                                                                               
 Number 0135                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN objected for discussion purposes.                        
                                                                               
 Number 0144                                                                   
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON explained Amendment 1 was a technical amendment.  It was           
 based on a suggestion by the Department of Revenue.  The bill was             
 written in conjunction with the Department of Revenue and the                 
 Department of Law.  The bill would impact the Department of Revenue           
 due to the bond.                                                              
                                                                               
 Number 0184                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN removed his objection.                                   
                                                                               
 CHAIR JAMES stated hearing no further objection, Amendment 1 was so           
 adopted.                                                                      
                                                                               
 Number 0186                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE IVAN moved to adopt Amendment 2 (9-GH2014/A.2).                
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN objected for discussion purposes.                        
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON explained Amendment 2 was based on a suggestion by                 
 Senator John Torgerson for greater legislative control.  The                  
 Department of Environmental Conservation agreed with the amendment.           
                                                                               
 Number 0238                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN removed his objection.                                   
                                                                               
 CHAIR JAMES stated hearing no further objection, Amendment 2 was so           
 adopted.                                                                      
                                                                               
 Number 0246                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE IVAN moved to adopt Amendment 3 (9-GH2014/A.3).                
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN objected for discussion purposes.                        
                                                                               
 Number 0255                                                                   
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON explained Amendment 3 modified eligibility.  The Senate            
 believed a state agency should not be part of the eligibility                 
 process.  Therefore, the amendment deleted "state agency" and                 
 inserted "other qualified entity."  The amendment was based on the            
 recommendation of Senators Fred Zharoff and Lyman Hoffman.  The               
 amendment also defined "other qualified entity" to include a                  
 municipality and those terms used in 33 U.S.C. 1383.  The                     
 Department of Law, the Department of Revenue, and the Department of           
 Environmental Conservation supported the amendment.                           
                                                                               
 Number 0328                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN removed his objection.                                   
                                                                               
 CHAIR JAMES stated hearing no further objection, Amendment 3 was so           
 adopted.                                                                      
                                                                               
 Number 0337                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE PORTER wondered if the suggestions by the Anchorage            
 Water and Wastewater Utility (AWWU) were considered.                          
                                                                               
 Number 0348                                                                   
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON replied the Anchorage Water and Wastewater Utility had             
 removed their amendments.  The amendments were considered earlier             
 when it appeared the bill would not receive a hearing.  The                   
 amendments were to simplify the bill for further support.                     
                                                                               
 Number 0379                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE PORTER wondered if the Anchorage Water and                     
 Wastewater Utility supported the bill.                                        
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON replied the AWWU definitely supported the bill.                    
                                                                               
 CHAIR JAMES replied the people in her district were interested in             
 the bill, but were concerned about the payback.                               
                                                                               
 Number 0398                                                                   
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON explained two out of the three concerns that Anchorage             
 had were addressed in the amendments adopted today.                           
                                                                               
 Number 0420                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN mentioned the problems associated with                   
 wastewater treatment such as hepatitis.  He was still concerned               
 about the lack of energy to support the projects in the rural                 
 areas.  Otherwise, he was in full support of HB 401.                          
                                                                               
 Number 0442                                                                   
                                                                               
 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN moved that CSHB 401(STA) move from the                   
 committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal                 
 notes.  Hearing no objection, it was so moved from the House State            
 Affairs Committee.                                                            
                                                                               
 MR. KELTON thanked the committee members.                                     

Document Name Date/Time Subjects